Ohio Senate amends bill that could hurt independent repairers

Jan. 1, 2020
The Ohio Senate voted 33-0 recently to amend Senate Bill 204 that could have negatively impacted independent repair facilities statewide.

The Ohio Senate voted 33-0 recently to amend Senate Bill 204 that could have negatively impacted independent repair facilities statewide.

The bill, as originally introduced, would have prohibited the sale of original equipment manufacturer automotive parts from being sold to aftermarket tire and auto repair facilities throughout the state of Ohio. In addition, the bill would have prohibited non-dealer automotive parts and repair facilities from participating in automotive recall and warranty programs.

SB 204 (Sen. Wagoner, R-Toledo) and a companion bill, House Bill 364 (Rep. Lundy, D-Lorain), were proposed as a result of a task force formed by Ohio Governor Ted Strickland. The companion bills were designed to be Ohio's version of a nationwide push by the automotive dealers to strengthen and protect auto franchise laws in the wake of forced dealership closings by General Motors Co. and Chrysler LLC. However, opponents argue that provisions in these franchise agreement measures go too far in creating a monopoly for the auto dealers and would severely limit options when it comes to repairing vehicles for Ohio's consumers.

The contentious provisions in both bills impose restrictions on the sales and distribution of auto parts, which would ultimately limit consumer choice.

The Automotive Service Association of Ohio (ASA-Ohio) and The Ohio Tire and Automotive Association (OTAA) oppose both bills. The bill is scheduled to begin its journey through the Ohio House of Representatives.

"Our concerns from the start were twofold: First, the original bill would have been extremely detrimental to many tire and automotive parts and repair businesses throughout the state," says John Miller Jr., president of OTAA. "Limiting what our members can sell and what types of service our members can offer to consumers would have put incredible pressure on this industry. And second, the bill would have limited consumer choice by forcing consumers to buy OEM parts directly from dealerships."

Sponsored Recommendations

ADAS Case Study: From 10 Calibrations a Month to Over 10 A Day

Originally published by Vehicle Service Pros, March 26, 2024

Snap-on Training: Approach to Intermittent Problems

Snap-on's live training sessions can help you develop your own strategy for approaching vehicle repair.

Snap-on Training: ADAS Level 2 - Component Testing

The second video for Snap-on's comprehensive overview of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), covering the fundamental concepts and functionalities essential for automotive...

Snap-on Training: Intro to ADAS

Snap-on's training video provides a comprehensive overview of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), covering the fundamental concepts and functionalities essential for automotive...

Voice Your Opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Vehicle Service Pros, create an account today!