Senate subcommittee looks into NHTSA's effectiveness

Oct. 2, 2014
It is the latest in a series of congressional reviews that stemmed from NHTSA’s handling of General Motor’s ignition switch failures.

The U.S Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation’s Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety and Insurance recently held a hearing titled, “Oversight of and Policy Considerations for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.” The purpose of this hearing was to evaluate the efficiency of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA) highway and vehicle safety programs. The hearing was the latest in a series of congressional reviews that stemmed from NHTSA’s handling of General Motor’s ignition switch failures.

Deputy Administrator David Friedman served as NHTSA’s witness. Other witnesses included Joseph Comé from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Jacqueline S. Gillan of the Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, Kendell Poole of the Governors Highway Safety Association, and Robert Strassburger of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers.

During the hearing, subcommittee members from both political parties had sharp criticism for NHTSA. Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), subcommittee chairman, said: “Nobody on this subcommittee believes that there aren’t people [at the agency] trying to do the right thing … but it’s hard to sit here and listen to you …You want to obfuscate responsibility rather than take responsibility.

”The remarks echoed the tone of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce Committee’s report released earlier that same day, detailing NHTSA’s perceived shortcomings in regard to the GM ignition switch recall. Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), committee chairman, said: “It is tragic that the evidence was staring NHTSA in the face and the agency didn’t identify the warnings. NHTSA exists not just to process what the company finds, but to dig deeper. They failed. We’ll keep looking for answers, and keep working toward solutions – whether it means changing our laws or pressing for change at the companies that follow them and the agencies that enforce them – but we know for sure that NHTSA was part of the problem and is going to have to be part of the solution."

To read the committee’s full report, visit:http://energycommerce.house.gov/sites/republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/files/Hearings/OI/20140915GMFootnotes/NHTSAreportfinal.pdf.

Sponsored Recommendations

Snap-on Training: Approach to Intermittent Problems

Snap-on's live training sessions can help you develop your own strategy for approaching vehicle repair.

Snap-on Training: ADAS Level 2 - Component Testing

The second video for Snap-on's comprehensive overview of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), covering the fundamental concepts and functionalities essential for automotive...

Snap-on Training: Intro to ADAS

Snap-on's training video provides a comprehensive overview of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), covering the fundamental concepts and functionalities essential for automotive...

Snap-on Training: Guided Component Tests Level 2

The second video for Snap-on's comprehensive overview of Guided Component Tests, covering the fundamental concepts essential for diagnostic procedures.

Voice Your Opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Vehicle Service Pros, create an account today!